[menog] Peering

[Gaurab Raj Upadhaya]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Hi,

Abeer Kamal wrote:
> there is not enough existing traffic to enable cost effective peering. 

Umm.. for me that's a very very generalized statement and almost
oxymoronic. May be that's me - because i (and am sure a few others on
this list;-)) have heard that statement being made a lot without evidence.

- From my own experience on IXPs availability of peering paths actually
create new avenues of content and traffic. Its' not really about
shifting your existing traffic - it's probably more about making the
path ready for growth. And people always seem to forget the volume of
e-mail traffic that goes across in the region.

Actually i will quote Salman here.. (paraphrasing what he told me in
MENOG1)..

"why is it that even after this major upgrade from 2Mbps to 100Mbps, we
still have 60% traffic on this link to Dubai"


Your ISPs may not be seeing more intra-gulf traffic, because they don't
even know what's in the gulf. thus, my question would be back to - what
is available and where - that would let me take large volumes of traffic
across the countries to a central location. Few factors to look at a)
Which countries have good environment and b) lets multiple people sink
fiber on the ground, and c) lets foreign companies setup business with
minimal of fuss and d) is easy to travel to and from, and e) has a large
enough local Internet economy to kick start the IX. and f) have either
existing or future planned international FO.

Would be interested to see which location would fit most of the above
criteria. let the discussion go further, i am sure everyone would want
to speak up here..

thanks
  - gaurab
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (Darwin)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFGr1CJSo7fU26F3X0RAouBAJ0TCoeKZV4iyIq4UxqG7aj6jT+BKQCfbbSH
LLCCMYMV3eaiC1Ukm0fY3UM=
=3a7h
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----