[menog] Useful URL for network operators

[Sunrise Networks Kiyam]

Dear All,
please let us agree on one thing which is respect each other's posts and
mails, should there be anything wrong with it we will 
start ignoring those mails ourselves instead of this ping pong email fight,
we all are busy and mainly at work, so let us just 
waste a few kb on a useless email instead of Megs of ping pong argue emails.





Thank you



Best regards,












-----Original Message-----
From: menog-bounces at menog.net [mailto:menog-bounces at menog.net] On Behalf Of
Guillaume FORTAINE
Sent: Tuesday, March 30, 2010 09:11
To: menog at menog.net
Subject: Re: [menog] Useful URL for network operators

Dear all,

Once again, please ignore Jim Mercer.

He should do more homeworks too.

a) I have never heard of Randy Bush


b) I didn't coin the term "EDoS" :

http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/?s=EDos

This term comes from Chris Hoff :

http://www.rationalsurvivability.com/blog/?page_id=2

"Hoff is currently Director of Cloud and Virtualization Solutions, Data 
Center Solutions at Cisco Systems."

Was it too hard to click on the "About" section from the blog post ?

c) I have never heard of him

Really, I am a bit tired from quick and poor replies from NANOGers. 
Simply mediocre engineers.

Best Regards,

Guillaume FORTAINE



On 03/30/2010 07:09 AM, Jim Mercer wrote:
> exact same message sent to NANOG:
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg07022.html
>
> i tend to respect Mr. Randy Bush, moreso that some newcomer.
>
> http://www.merit.edu/mail.archives/nanog/msg07024.html
>
> "could you please keep a constant email address so we don't have to keep
> adding to our mail filters?  thanks.
>
> randy"
>
> judging from his posts to NANOG, i am unsure if he is a salesman for some
> product and is just trying to sneak his company into things, or if he is a
> spoiled child, looking for attention.
>
> an example is here:
> http://seclists.org/nanog/2010/Mar/626
>
> in this thread, i think he is trying to create a new term "EDoS", but
because
> the people on NANOG are not adopting it, he gets childish and offended.
>
> anyways, probably best to just ignore him.
>
> --
> jim
>
>
> On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 01:44:13AM +0200, Guillaume FORTAINE wrote:
>    
>> Dear all,
>>
>> Please ignore Richard Barnes.
>>
>> He should really do more homeworks.
>>
>> a) It seems that he doesn't know Google Translate (that is integrated in
>> Chromium v5)
>>
>> b) He didn't check the links in the Webpage. There is especially one
>> that has been developed by the Google Infrastructure Security Team for
>> their Network Filtering needs.
>>
>> c) I have never heard of him.
>>
>> Best Regards,
>>
>> Guillaume FORTAINE
>>
>>
>>
>> On 03/28/2010 12:02 AM, Richard Barnes wrote:
>>      
>>> Dear all,
>>>
>>> Please ignore this link (it's in Japanese anyway!).   M. Fortaine has
>>> been spamming NANOG and other lists, and now he seems to have
>>> discovered MENOG.
>>>
>>> If you're interested, there are much more useful places for
>>> information on BGP tools, such as:
>>> <http://www.bgp4.as/>
>>>
>>> --Richard
>>>
>>>
>>> On Sat, Mar 27, 2010 at 9:54 AM, Guillaume FORTAINE<gfortaine at live.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>        
>>>> Misses, Misters,
>>>>
>>>> FYI :
>>>>
>>>> http://tools.bgp4.jp/index.php?tools%20team/tools
>>>>
>>>> Best Regards,
>>>>
>>>> Guillaume FORTAINE
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> Menog mailing list
>>>> Menog at menog.net
>>>> http://lists.menog.net/mailman/listinfo/menog
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>          
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Menog mailing list
>>> Menog at menog.net
>>> http://lists.menog.net/mailman/listinfo/menog
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>        
>> _______________________________________________
>> Menog mailing list
>> Menog at menog.net
>> http://lists.menog.net/mailman/listinfo/menog
>>      
>    

_______________________________________________
Menog mailing list
Menog at menog.net
http://lists.menog.net/mailman/listinfo/menog